Read and Review God the Economist the book Essay

Read and Review God the Economist the book - Essay Example re discussed thoroughly, along with the idea of the Christian tradition and the application of radical implications for individual Christians and for the churches. M. Douglas Meeks received his B.D. and his Ph.D. from Duke University and studied as a Fulbright Fellow at Tubingen University. Previously ranking as the dean and professor of systematic theology at Wesley Theological Seminary in Washington, DC, as well as professor of systematic theology at Eden Theological Seminary in St. Louis, Meeks is the author, co-author or editor of 16 books, one of his most praised being this one in particular – God the Economist. Meeks’ record of professional service includes membership on a variety of academic and ecclesial councils and commissions dealing with theology and economy, religion and science, liberation theology, points at issue between black and white theologies, and theological education. He is also an ordained minister in the United Methodist Church. These past and present qualities are what enabled Meeks to have such an accurate and intellectual view on two such critical subjects – God and the economy. When it comes to Christians and the church speaking about economy, or vice versa, it seems that those involved often falter at the subject. In this book, Meeks is noted for developing his doctrine of the economist God in order to show that provision for all the needs of all people is not simply an add-on to the Christian faith but is instead entirely relevant and is its very heart and soul. Meeks centers his argument on a social conception of the Trinity, each of whose persons are understood to be giving and sustaining, rather than self-sufficient and domineering. A main point that Meeks makes in this book is that we as a world – especially in the North American countries – fail to see the destitution and despair both economically and spiritually around us, while all the time trying to fix massive other problems which seem to actually not be near as