Question Response form Case Study Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Question Response form Case Study - Essay Example whoreson inherited problems at Modrow plant he was not included in initial planning and played out a lot of time in getting up to speed. His friendly and easy going berth was not appreciated in the English plant as well as the Modrow plant by Canadian workers, as his casual strolls were considered as suspicious and steadily his stature and authority as a plant motorbus was undermined by the workers. The limitations he had as a attracter was his inability to understand history practices and delegating tasks to his sub-ordinates, as a result he started taking interest in minor or unimportant issues of the plant. This micro management kept him away from core issues rising from involution and modernization of the plant. His attempts to pee insights by spending time in manufacturing area were not ideal and a practiceing sort towards middle management should have brought better results in implementing the channels he wanted. He was not furnished by the relevant information by middle management as they had doubts about his abilities as a leader additionally his obsession for gaining insight from workers left the middle management with overlook of trust in him. In order for a successful change to come whether it is cost saving initiative, modernization or elaboration Dick should have paid attention to more strategic issues of the time and used his time for inculcating trust within management, there are many leaders who lack the technical knowledge or fellowship but they achieve results by leaving the technical aspects of the work to technical staff communicating with their concern managers and not seeing everything as a potential for cost saving initiatives. A gradual or incremental change would have helped Dick in first normalizing the situation due to his appointment fore of local operating staff, gain trust of managers by staying away from the workers followed by understanding the modernization and expan sion challenges. This change is suggested keeping the personality of Dick in consideration, consequently an authoritative leader would have opted for a rapid change while resisting forces would have been removed or sidelined. Dick was not authoritative and it was wind nuisance that made him show anger towards the foremen, the strategic change approach best for him was the above express incremental one with less suspicion and exploration towards prevailing methods used by workers (Daft, 2010). Question 2. The change or improvement measure proposed by Dick to the foremen was justified and could have saved costs, what Dick confused in bringing this change was the consideration of issues faced by workers and how they wanted to work. The reason foremen disagreed with him was due to his lack of trust in him as a leader, alternatively Dick should have requested the siding manager to implement the new method of scrapping. Dick did not follow the chain of command nor did he abet his stat ure as a plant manager, as a result he was ignored by the foremen and the workers alike. Change is always faced by resistance this resistance comes from confusion or the need to pass over status quo hence such resisting elements should be dealt by the managers by addressing concerns of the workers and explaining value addition to them and to the organization. Even though Dicks intentions were good but his approach led to the