Hegel Vs. Marx free essay sample

# 8230 ; Who Is More Free? Essay, Research Paper Human freedom is what Marx described it as: absolute cognition derived from the realisation that you are a portion of everything and the deficiency of dependence on material goods. Marx s technique of thesi and antithesi coming together to organize the following conjuration of society is in my head the most sensible. Where Hegel said history changed as a consequence of geist, or head, Marx believed it changed thanks to economic displacements. Marx believed human freedom would come at the realisation of absolute cognition, which would non happen until adult male was free from stuff demands, and controlled the agency of production. Hegel nevertheless believed the antonym: that people must foremost achieve absolute cognition before they can command the manner history progresses. Kant I must disregard instantly for this ground: he believes that for one to be able to achieve absolute cognition, one must hold no spacial or ocular restrictions. We will write a custom essay sample on Hegel Vs. Marx or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page He even goes so far as to state that so merely manner one could populate this manner is if they were Gods. However, at the same clip he alienates himself and mankind from that God by stating it is impossible to see all things, because there may be things that merely can non be seen, and there is no manner to see whether those things exist or non. For Kant human freedom is a comparative impossibleness, and so it would be incorrect to state he preserves it any manner, form or signifier. As Magee points out on page 180, Kant argues that it would be impossible for us to cognize whether or non god exists, and whether or non we have souls. As Warnock subsequently points out, the lone manner for a individual to achieve absolute cognition and therefore freedom would be if they were Gods. But, Kant himself alienates humanity from God by labeling him imperceivable to people. So, a individual can non be god, hence a individual can non achieve absolute cognition, and hence a individual can non be free. Hegel believed absolute cognition came before freedom, in that leting the head to recognize that it does non hold to be controlled by outside forces makes manner for a more rational position of the universe, and so people are no longer tied down by anything. Marx said the antonym. First, he believed that people would non be held down by anything, and so they would derive their freedom. I agree with Marx that there is non lasting human nature, but I do believe that the current province of things in the universe allows there to be a changeless among people of the past several coevalss, and will stay true through the following few. That invariable is the demand for things that one lacks. Marx, though he denied there was any human nature at all, did advert the on the job category desire to take over the agencies of production. I agree with Marx and Hegel that freedom is absolute cognition, but I disagree with Hegel s method of acquiring at that place. Marx s thought makes more sense. Before we can obtain this absolute cognition, we must first shed everything that is keeping it back from us. In this coevals, though there may be other things maintaining us off from it every bit good, our demand for the stuff prevents us from that cognition. So, to acquire rid of that demand would let for the head to believe about other things, and that would take to growing of the head and finally absolute cognition. Hegel s method would necessitate us to make this cognition while we were in the center of economic convulsion, and when one is bothered by th e idea of endurance, they do non hold much clip to come to decisions sing existent truth. Marx s thought of the single decision making what is best for itself and the community is, in my head, the closest thing to true freedom. It implies that picks are made based on a individuals apprehension of themselves, and hence besides implies a freedom to be able to alter whatever profession that individual may take. A common unfavorable judgment of Marx s system of beliefs is that human nature would non let such a community to be, but harmonizing to Marx s doctrine, human nature is in direct correlativity with the economic conditions of a given society. In a true Marxist Communist society, the agencies of production would be controlled by everyone, and so economic conditions would be of no concern. This means that the inquiry of human nature interfering would non be a inquiry at all. True freedom can be defined as a status in which the topic is non held back from anything by anything. With Marx, the lone thing keeping people back are the economic conditions. Hegel believes people are keeping themselves back by neglecting to do the connexion between themselves and everything else. Marx would state to Hegel that people will non be able to do that connexion until they are no longer burdened by the likes of the economic conditions. Therefore, Hegel s freedom could non be achieved. Merely Marx s freedom is possible, and so he is the best at continuing my apprehension of what freedom is.